Software Review

Current Reviews


The following issue has multiple stages:

659


rOpenSci software peer-review is currently handling:

  • 2 pre-submission issues
  • 16 standard issues
  • 7 stats issues

The following table provides details of each issue, with results filtered by the following controls:

  • “Submission Stage” to list issues with the specified stage.
  • “Holding” to list issues which are on hold (true) or not (false).
  • “Sort By” to sort results either by the Submission Stage (“stage”, 0-5), or “urgency”, as described below.

Some rows in the table are highlighted to visually indicate degrees of urgency according to the scheme defined in the following sub-section. Rows with no highlight may be considered up-to-date, and require no action. Submissions which have not yet been given a ‘Stage’ label are listed below as ‘(No stage)’, and highlighted with the highest urgency level.


Urgency of Reviews

Levels of urgency used in the previous table are coloured according to the following scheme:

Levels of urgency are calculated from the following expected times for each review stage:

stage time (days)
0/Pre-submission 7
1/Editor Checks 7
2/Seeking Reviewers 14
3/Reviewer(s) Assigned 21
4/Review(s) in Awaiting Changes 21
5/Awaiting Reviewer(s) Response 21

Levels of urgency for each review are times taken for current stage as a multiple of those base times, with values rounded down to nearest integer. For example, a submission which has been undergoing 1\/Editor Checks for 17 days would have an urgency of floor(17/7) = 2. A submission which has been under review (stage 3\/Reviewer(s) Assigned) for 12 weeks would have an urgency of floor(12 * 7 / 21) = 4. These urgency levels then map on to the colour codes shown above.